Archive for May 2010

Roger and Debbie Ivester

May 23, 2010

img_4934

A 4-Inch (102mm) Refractor Can Be An Excellent Deep-Sky Telescope: Finally Sirius B, Barnard’s Galaxy, and Much More….

May 23, 2010

All Observer’s Challenge Reports to-date:

https://rogerivester.com/category/observers-challenge-reports-complete/ 143 consecutive months as of November 2020

rogers-pictures-003

After more than 20 years, I finally replaced the original 6 x 30 finder on my 102 mm refractor, with an 8 x 50.

IMG_1518 

larger finder makes it much easier when attempting to find the exact location of that very faint deep-sky object. 

 

photo

At current, I’m working my way through another double star list, taking my time to sketch each double, noting the colors, checking the position angle and also drawing a few field stars.   

The value of a correct image diagonal:

I’m now using a correct image 90º diagonal.  The view through a standard 90º diagonal, whether using a refractor, Schmidt-Cassegrain or Maksutov-Cassegrain makes it impossible to correctly draw “scientifically” a deep-sky object.  

The mirror-reverse image as seen through a (90º diagonal) does not allow me to draw the objects scientifically correct.  I like to make all my sketches showing north at the top and west to the right.  

https://rogerivester.com/2014/03/06/a-new-diagonal-for-my-refractor-correct-image-and-the-advantages/   

Pencil Sketching expanded: 

A while back it occurred to me that there should be a listing of the various types of deep-sky sketching.  After a bit of thought I came up with the following:  

Visual detailed sketching:  Observing an object through a telescope via an eyepiece. Drawing the object on paper “as verbatim” as possible using a pencil, chalk or other.

Impression astro-sketching:  A sketch made at the eyepiece, using a pencil, chalk or charcoal and representing what the observer mentally perceives, without a great degree of scale or detail.  Want to know more about this type of sketching?  Pull out your copy of the “Messier Album” by John Mallas and Evered Kreimer. 

Computer-enhanced sketching:  An astro-sketch generated using a computer, from “sometimes” a rough pencil sketch.  However, if you choose this system, please let it be known to your readers, that it is a computer assisted drawing.   

I try to make my sketches as realistic as possible, never embellishing, regardless of how faint the object is.  My objective is to present the deep-sky sketch as close as possible to the eyepiece view.  

unadjustednonraw_thumb_3b08

unadjustednonraw_thumb_3b07

Rogers M-081 Inverted

Rogers NGC-2300 Inverted

Scanned Image 160920001

Roger IC 1805

M13 And The Elusive Propeller

Pacman Nebula - NGC 281

 

I wanted to include a picture of my “vintage” Meade model DS-10A f/4.5 reflector telescope.  This scope has served me well since my purchase back in February 1992.  Five years later in 1997, I purchased my 102mm Orion/Vixen f/9.8 achromatic refractor.  

This might prove that a lifetime of enjoyment as an amateur astronomer can be enjoyed with “humble” telescopes, but of good quality and not necessarily the most expensive ones.  

And remember…the telescope that’s used the most is the best telescope. 

DSCF5178

Seeing Sirius B: 

“Finally….after more than 35 years, I was able to see Sirius B, better known as the “Pup.”  Date of observation:  March 14th 2012

Telescope:  4-inch (102mm) Orion/Vixen f/9.8 achromatic refractor.  Conditions:  Excellent seeing and transparency    

How did I become interested in this famous star and its faint companion?  

I purchased my first serious telescope in 1977, which was a 4 1/4-inch f/10, Edmund Scientific reflector.  Even though this was not my first choice for a telescope, it was the best my budget would allow at the time.  My first choice would have been the 6-inch Edmund f/8 EQ (Super Space Conquerer) reflector.  

I started reading anything and everything about astronomy, and was fortunate to find “The Edmund Sky Guide” by Terence Dickinson and Sam Brown.  In this book was a paragraph concerning Sirius and its companion which caught my attention.  Double stars were something new to me at that time.    

I’m really glad that I purchased the Edmund books, so many years ago. 

Back to Sirius B: 

Due to the extreme and overwhelming brightness of Sirius as compared to the much fainter companion, it can be extremely difficult to see the dimmer star.  

I tried for at least a couple of years (mid-70’s) in a feeble attempt to see the companion (a.k.a the “Pup” or Sirius B) with my humble 4 1/4-inch Edmund reflector, but without success.   

During the fall of 2011, double star expert, astronomy author, lecturer and double star enthusiast, James Mullaney, informed me that he had heard of an amateur being able to see the companion using a 4-inch refractor. 

I had pretty much given up on seeing Sirius B in 2012, thinking it was not possible with an amateur scope.  However, after hearing that an another amateur had been successful at seeing the companion gave me the idea that I should try again.  

It was my plan to use my 102mm f/9.8 achromatic refractor: 

This telescope has allowed me to separate many close and difficult doubles over the years, often achieving or exceeding “Dawes Limit.”   

https://www.astronomics.com/info-library/astronomical-terms/dawes-limit/

When Sirius B was at a relatively wide separation during the 70’s, again, I was using a spherical mirror, 4 1/4-inch f/10 reflector, not exactly the preferred telescope for accomplishing such a feat.  

On the night of March 14th 2012, and using the 102mm refractor:

I made preparations to observe Sirius.  After letting the telescope cool down for at least an hour and making a few visual test…I determined the seeing was excellent!  

My excitement was building as it had been a long time since first reading about Sirius and Sirius B so many years earlier.   

I had casually observed Sirius on many occasions over the years with a variety of telescopes, but never seriously looking for or expecting to see the companion.

Afteadjusted my astro-chair and removing the diagonal, I started with a magnification of 83x, but to no avail.  I increased the magnification to 232x, all the while keeping my eye perfectly still.  

The seeing was very good.  And Sirius was fairly sharp, not the large bloated star that I was so used to seeing. 

I looked very carefully for at least 30 or more minutes, probably more like an hour, when a very faint star appeared so very close to Sirius.  

That was it, but probably knowing the position-angle made it possible.  However, I could not hold the companion, or Sirius B constantly.  It was extremely difficult.  But after 40 years, I had finally seen the companion to Sirius.  

I had glimpsed Sirius B (or so I thought) the previous month (February 2012) but seeing was not that good, and just had to have another observation to confirm my sighting.  

Seeing the companion with another 4-inch refractor:   A Takahashi FC-100H, f/8 fluorite doublet during the winter of 2016:

Another sighting of the companion of Sirius using a 4-inch Takahashi FC-100H, f/8 doublet fluorite.  Sirius B was “actually very easy” with this scope.  It was much easier with this “premium” telescope as compared to the view through my 102mm f/10 achromat…as one would expect.  

Winter of 2016:

A group of at six or more amateurs took the test using the Takahashi refractor, and what did they see?   

Using the face of a clock, and all without sharing their perceived position of the companion until everyone had the opportunity to observe.  When the last person completed their observation, all correctly identified the position of Sirius B.  

Some were very skilled observers, but a couple or more were not, however, all could “fairly easily” locate and see the companion.  

I was not surprised, as when I observed the companion earlier, it was easy (yes…easy) and was so precise and pinpoint in this telescope. 

Completing a list of deep-sky objects: 

One of my first reference books was “The Finest Deep-Sky Objects” by James Mullaney and Wallace McCall.  I had observed all 105 objects many times, accumulating over 600 or more, 3 x 5 note cards, complete with notes and sketches.  

However, one of the objects on this list was missing…the companion to Sirius.  After my visual sighting of Sirius B, I now have notes and sketches of all objects listed in that great list of deep-sky objects.  

I couldn’t have selected a better reference book to start with: 

The 105 objects featured in the FDSO’s is comprised of many famous and popular double/multiple stars, but also galaxies, star clusters, red stars and nebulae.  

This book was the perfect primer for a new and budding amateur like myself, as It gave me an introduction to all types of deep-sky objects.  

Such as:  to encourage the study of double and multiple stars and to learn how to enjoy the “jewels of the night sky.”  This name was coined for the beautiful color contrast of so many doubles.         

Back to Sirius B: 

After seeing Sirius B, I went to bed smiling, as another observing goal had been accomplished.  It was a great feeling!

Have you seen Sirius B, better known as the Pup?  Why not give it a try?  

Sirius. “A dazzling blue-white sapphire with famed white-dwarf companion!  Orbital period 51 years.  Now widening but still not an easy split most nights.  Mags -1.5/8.5  Sep.  7”  “The Cambridge Double Star Atlas”  by James Mullaney and Wil Tirion

Why not consider a small refractor for some visual observing of other deep-sky objects?    

I have always been interested in the possibilities of using a small telescope, especially a good quality refractor.  A refractor can present pin-point star images and a velvety black background which can improve the contrast of most deep-sky objects.  The superior contrast of a refractor can often times allow views of deep-sky objects to rival or even exceed larger telescopes of more complex designs.  

NGC 6822 (Barnard’s galaxy) in Sagittarius:

It should also be noted that a very low surface brightness object, can often times be better observed at low magnification with a small refractor.  A good example of this would be NGC 6822 (Barnard’s Galaxy) in Sagittarius. 

“A weak glow but definite glow in 6 cm, where it appears elongated N-S and shows a very slight central concentration.  In 25 cm motion of the field helps in showing the low surface brightness galaxy, but it is difficult and ill-defined at best.” Observing Handbook and Catalog Of Deep-Sky Objects by Christian B. Luginbuhl and Brian A. Skiff.  

Finally…after almost 25 years (many years I attempted with my 10-inch reflector) but had never been successful.  In September 2014, I was able to sketch and make notes of this elusive galaxy, NGC 6822, using the 102mm refractor.  

Much of my problem was/had been due to light glow from a pesky unshielded street light in close proximity to my backyard.  A dark sky is critical for locating and observing this faint low surface galaxy.  

And so, with NGC 6822, another difficult object was checked off my list. 

The following sketch was made using the refractor with nothing more than a No. 2 pencil, a blank 5 x 8 notecard, with the colors inverted using a scanner.

Rogers NGC-6822

The following image by Dr. James Dire of Hawaii using a 190 mm Maksutov-Cassegrain telescope.

NGC6822

The complete Observer’s Challenge Report for NGC 6822:

AUGUST 2014 OBSERVERS CHALLENGE – NGC-6822

“The Observing Handbook and Catalog of Deep-Sky Objects” By Christian B. Luginbuhl and Brian A. Skiff

This is the reference book that took me to a higher level as an amateur astronomer, and it remains the book that I use most often with all my observing sessions.   

I like the descriptions by the authors describing the views with various telescopes, especially with a 60mm refractor.  This causes me to want to follow their observations and see what’s possible for me using a 60mm refractor, however, I don’t have one.  

No problem:  I have a home-made 60mm stop-down mask for use with my 102mm refractor.  This allows me the opportunity to observe the object with a 60 mm refractor, without having to add another telescope.  I can then make visual observing notes and sketches for two scopes.

Using a stop-down mask for an effective aperture of 60mm’s and a focal ratio of  f/16.7 

Seeing the companion to Polaris using an effective aperture of 60mm’s:   

Polaris has a magnitude of 2.1 and the secondary or companion at a much fainter 9.0 magnitude with a wide separation of 19 arc seconds.  The extreme difference in magnitudes can make this double more difficult to separate than you might think, especially if seeing is less than good. 

April 19th 2018:  102mm f/9.8 achromatic refractor with an effective aperture of 60 mm’s.  

Seeing excellent: 12.5mm eyepiece plus a 2.8x Barlow for a magnification of 80x.  The companion was clearly visible as a tiny bluish dot.  

https://rogerivester.com/2018/04/15/polaris-double-star-separating-and-seeing-the-companion-with-a-small-telescope/

IMG_0023 

What is the smallest aperture that will allow me to see the companion to Polaris?  The following photo shows an effective aperture of 45 mm’s.  

However, as of current, I’ve been unable to see the companion with this aperture (45mm’s).  

357125662_6_1

Seeing the companion of Polaris using an 80 mm f/5 refractor:

My son surprised me with an 80 mm f/5 refractor for a birthday

In the spring of 2018, and on the night of April 20th, I received my present:  An 80 mm model f/5 achromatic refractor.  But how would it perform?

Seeing was very good, and using a 12.5mm eyepiece plus a 2.8x University Optics Klee Barlow for a magnification of 90x.  

The companion to polaris was visible as a tiny bluish dot.  Very similar to the view using the 102 mm reduced to 60 mm’s.  Beautiful in both telescopes.   

IMG_2497  

https://rogerivester.com/2018/04/04/orion-ct80-refractor-review/

When observing with my 80mm or 102mm refractor, I always use a 1.25-inch correct image diagonal.  For me it’s essential when sketching a deep-sky object, to have the correct “scientific” orientation in the eyepiece field-of-view.  

April 20th 2018:  80mm f/5 achromatic refractor.  Similar conditions to my observation on the 19th. Using the same eyepiece combinations (90x) and was easily able to see the companion as a tiny bluish dot.  A great little scope which is very easy to take outside, including the mount…all in one trip.  If time is limited to an hour or less, this is the telescope I use. 

Beginning amateur astronomy in 1967 with a 60 mm refractor: 

My older brother purchased a 60mm f/15 EQ Jason Refractor in the mid-60’s, when I was only thirteen years old.  This was the telescope that got me interested in astronomy.  I would set it up in a weedy field beside of my house in a very rural area of the foothills of North Carolina.  I had difficulty finding anything other than the moon, Venus, Saturn and Jupiter, but eventually my observing skills did improve.  I’m really glad that I persevered and stuck with it. 

Maintenance of a refractor: 

I have always kept the lens capped on the 102mm refactor, when not in use and the OTA is always stored in a padded case.  In the eighteen years that I have owned this telescope, the objective lens has never required cleaning.   The objective lens is also permanently collimated, without any adjusters, and was in perfect collimation when I received it.  There has been no change after purchasing the scope in 1997, and with plenty of use.   

For most part, a refractor is much more durable and able to suffer less from mishandling and rough treatment than reflector’s and catadioptric telescope’s.   

A very high quality 4-inch refractor during the 50’s through the 70’s, had to be a Unitron, with the standard f/15 focal ratio.  The long focal length was necessary for an achromatic refractor telescope…to reduce false color.  

This telescope could be obtained with either of two mounts.  One being a field tripod with wooden legs, and the other…a massive bell-shaped pier with a mechanical weight-driven clock drive.  The latter was designed for a permanent location.  A 4-inch f/15 refractor with any type of equatorial mount for most part should not be considered a portable instrument.        

John Mallas who co-authorded “The Messier Album” with Evered Kreimer, used a 4-inch f/15 Unitron to examine all Messier objects between 1958 and 1962, from Covina, California.  This is a fabulous book and I still use it as a reference quite often, even to this day.    

The modern era of refractor telescope’s arrive:

However, with the advent of exotic glass, better anti-reflection coatings and short focal lengths… like the slide-rule, the day of the 4-inch and larger f/15 refractor was over.     Roger Ivester

NGC 4889 and NGC 4874 – Galaxies in Coma Berenices – 10-inch reflector @ 143x

May 23, 2010

Faint galaxies in Coma

NGC 4889 and NGC 4874 10-inch reflector @ 143x

NGC 3190 – Galaxy Cluster – 10-inch Reflector at 114x – FOV 1/2º

May 23, 2010

NGC 3190 Galaxy Cluster - 10-inch Reflector @ 114x

NGC 3190 compact galaxy cluster; Leo

M40 Double Star, and Galaxies NGC 4290 (M11.8) NCG 4284 (M13.5) Telescope: 10-inch reflector @ 142x

May 22, 2010

M-40 Plus NGC4290 And NGC4284

The above sketch was made using a white charcoal pencil on black card stock.   Please note the very faint galaxy, NGC 4284 to the left, making a triangle with two faint stars.   Double Star, M40 makes for an excellent starting point to assist in locating the two galaxies.   roger

NGC 2903 galaxy in Leo, 10-inch reflector @ 143x

May 21, 2010

NGC-2903 10-inch jpg

NGC 2903 Galaxy in Leo, 10-inch reflector @ 142x

M105, NGC 3384, NGC 3389, 10-inch reflector

May 21, 2010

M105, NGC 3384, NGC 3389

M105, NGC 3384, NGC 3389

NGC 253 galaxy in Sculptor, 14.5-inch reflector

May 21, 2010

NGC 253

NGC 253, galaxy in Sculptor, 14.5-inch Reflector

“The Virgo 9” Nine Galaxies All within a 1° Field of View, When Centered on M86

May 21, 2010

     A great galaxy group of nine galaxies when (centered on M86) however, there are a number of other galaxies in this area in very close proximity.  

     But the “Virgo 9” allows anyone with an 8-inch or larger telescope, the opportunity to use a wide-field eyepiece with “hopefully” enough magnification and field to observe all nine.  

     I thought this unique galaxy group needed a unique name…and a modern name at that.  So I thought the “Virgo 9” sounded perfect. 

     The galaxies are identified in the following photo, and in the sketch at the bottom of this article.  

     Something to NOTE:   I was unable to see three of the faintest galaxies with my 10-inch reflector at 57x, as I needed more magnification.  I could see all galaxies at 114x, but my best views of the fainter members came at 160x.  

     I tried to sketch the fainter galaxies in their appropriate location, at 160x, and to scale as best as I could.  

     However, I now have an eyepiece that will give me a magnification of 103x, and only slightly less than a 1º FOV.  All galaxies will be visible at the 103x magnification, and if I like, I can increase the magnification to sketch in the fainter details of the three faintest members.  

Digital images following:   

     A excellent image of the nine galaxies “designated” all within a 1º field of view, by Mario Motta of Massachusetts.   

Specifications:  A two hour twenty minute exposure stacked of five minute subs.  Taken with my 6-inch f/7.2 refractor that piggybacks on my 32-inch telescope.  This image was taken with a new latest camera.  A ZWO AS16200, processed in pixinsight.   Mario 

M86-circleLabled

Image reduced to an approximate 1º FOV, as an illustration for an EP field.  But as you know, don’t expect the following view…as the fainter galaxies will be very faint when using an eyepiece and an 8 or 10-inch telescope.    

IMG_1510

 

     

I first found out about this galaxy cluster, from the late Tom Lorenzin, author of “1000+ The Amateur Astronomer’s Field Guide to Deep-Sky Observing.”  

     Tom asked me on the evening of (March 1993) if I’d ever viewed all nine galaxies within a 1° field of view, when centered on M86.  

However, my attempt would come a few years later on March 16, 1999:

My notes from that night are listed below, and my sketch following: 

 

M 84:  (mag. sfc. br. 12.6)  Bright, with a brighter more concentrated middle, mostly round.

M 86:  (mag. sfc. br. 13.2)  Bright, brighter middle, round, very similar to M84, but not as well concentrated.

NGC 4387:  (mag. sfc. br. 12.9)  A very faint mostly round blur. Difficult at best, requiring averted vision.

NGC 4388:  (mag. sfc. br. 13.1)  Low surface brightness, elongated slash with an E-W orientation.

NGC 4402:  (mag. sfc. br. 13.0)  Very faint slash, low surface brightness.

NGC 4413:  (mag. sfc. br. 14.3)  Small, very faint and dim, diffuse with little concentration, mostly round.

NGC 4425:  (mag. sfc br. 13.2)  Very faint, elongated, axis N-S, small and dim.

NGC 4435:  (mag. sfc. br. 12.6)  Fairly bright, mostly round, stellar nucleus, smaller than NGC 4438.

NGC 4438: (mag. sfc.br. 13.8)  Bright, elongated with a brighter middle.

 

Since I making the following sketch, it has been my desire to observe this galaxy cluster again and with an improved sketch, but then I would say:  “maybe next year, and with so many other galaxies to sketch and so little time”  

Roger Ivester

Virgo Galaxy Cluster

416075907_1_3

M2 and dark lane, 4-inch refractor

May 21, 2010

M2 Globular Cluster, Aquarius

M2 and Dark Lane, Scope: 4-inch refractor @ 175x