Archive for January 2020

NGC 1931 – Bright Nebula and Cluster in Auriga: February 2020 Observer’s Challenge Report

January 23, 2020



Compiled by:

Roger Ivester, North Carolina


Sue French, New York

February 2020

Report #133

NGC 1931 Bright Nebula and Cluster in Auriga 

Sharing Observations and Bringing Amateur Astronomers Together


   The purpose of the Observer’s Challenge is to encourage the pursuit of visual observing. It’s open to everyone who’s interested, and if you’re able to contribute notes, and/or drawings, we’ll be happy to include them in our monthly summary. Visual astronomy depends on what’s seen through the eyepiece. Not only does it satisfy an innate curiosity, but it allows the visual observer to discover the beauty and the wonderment of the night sky. Before photography, all observations depended on what astronomers saw in the eyepiece, and how they recorded their observations. This was done through notes and drawings, and that’s the tradition we’re stressing in the Observer’s Challenge. And for folks with an interest in astrophotography, your digital images and notes are just as welcome. The hope is that you’ll read through these reports and become inspired to take more time at the eyepiece, study each object, and look for those subtle details that you might never have noticed before.

NGC 1931 

NGC 1931 is a small emission and reflection nebula with an involved cluster. The brightest part of the nebula has a trapezium system at its heart. Somewhat at odds with their name, trapezium systems can consist of more than four stars, and they don’t have to be arrayed in a trapezoidal shape. The term was initially coined to mean “a multiple star system whose pairwise separations are of the same order.” Some later researchers include groups whose stars may not be gravitationally bound. NGC 1931 is roughly 7500 light-years away from us.

William Herschel discovered this NGC 1931 in 1793. His journal entry reads, “Very bright, irregularly round, about 4 or 5′ diameter. Seems to have one or two stars in the middle or an irregular nucleus. The chevelure diminishes very gradually


February Observer’s Challenge Final:  Click on the Following link: 

February 2020 OBSERVERS CHALLENGE _ NGC 1931

February:  NGC 1931 – Bright  Nebula and Cluster – Auriga; Mag. V= 10.1;  Size 6′ 

RA:  05h  31m   Dec.  +34º  14′ 


The embedded Stars in NGC 1931:  by Sue French   

     Don’t be surprised about not seeing the stars in NGC 1931.  Folks get very mixed results.  Go to and type NGC 1931 in the Designation box, then look at everyone’s sketches.  

     Here’s a long-ago Amastro post from Brian Skiff that gives the magnitudes of the trapezium system embedded in the brightest part of the nebula.  I see one of these stars, or a blend of them, in the 105mm scope.  The 10-inch at 213× gives me six stars in the brightest part of the nebulosity plus several mag 11-13½ stars scattered to the south.  I’ve pasted an image below Brian’s data and labeled the stars on it.  The image is in infrared so that the nebulosity doesn’t blot out the stars. Below the Aladin image is a WEBDA chart showing which stars I saw in the main group through the 10-inch..

     While cleaning up some star-lists, I collected data for stars in the nebulous open cluster NGC 1931 in Auriga.  The group contains a faint trapezium system, ADS 4112, that might be of interest to ‘amastro’ folks. The specs for the group are shown below.  The V magnitudes for the stars come from modern photoelectric or CCD studies.  The separations derive from positions in the 2MASS catalogue, which should be better than the 100-year-old visual micrometry, but which in any case match the old data to within a few tenths of an arcsecond. The brighter trio is straightforward in a small telescope; in 1989 I was able to make out the fourth ‘E’ component very faintly in my 6-inch refractor at 200x.  The very faint, close ‘D’ companion to star ‘B’ doubtless requires a very large aperture.  The data quoted for it is from S. W. Burnham’s work; the magnitude is possibly too bright.  The 2MASS coordinates are listed at the bottom.  Star ‘D’ does not appear in any astrometric catalogue.  The spectral types for the three brightest stars, by the way, are B0V, B0.5V, and B1V.  Thus the object should contain some emission, although there must be a substantial reflection component, since filters do not provide much contrast enhancement.   



ADS 4112 = BD+34 1074:  5 31 27  +34 14.9 (2000)

V mags      sep    pa

AB  11.5,12.3    8″.1  239

AC       13.0   10″.5  310

AE       14.0   14″.6   17

BD      (15.8)   2″.3  322


RA   (2000)   Dec

A   5 31 27.08  +34 14 49.6

B   5 31 26.54  +34 14 45.0

C   5 31 26.43  +34 14 56.3

E   5 31 27.50  +34 15 03.2


Sue French: Observer from New York

254/1494mm (10-inch f/5.8) Newtonian. Seeing: fair. Transparency: a little better than average.

43×: NGC 1931 is just a short hop westward from starfish-like M36. It presents a small hazy spot surrounding a star.

115×: The nebula spans about 3 arcminutes, and the star now appears triple. Several additional stars straggle south through west-southwest of the nebulous mass.

213×: Six stars are now buried in the nebulosity, three brightest members arranged in a little triangle.

The WEBDA cluster plot below marks the four trapezium-system stars viewed as well as two additional stars spotted within the nebula.

V-magnitudes of the trapezium stars according to WEBDA:

A=11.4, B=12.3, C=13.0, E=14.0. There is a component D in the trapezium system very close to B, but it’s thought to be magnitude 15.8 or dimmer and was not seen. The two arrowed stars were visible: the northern one shining at magnitude 14.1, and the southern one at magnitude 14.5.

After the star-plot is the sketch I made at 213× with the 10-inch scope on 17 February 2020 at 7pm EST. It was a pleasant night for February. The temperature was in the lower 20s and there was no wind. Unfortunately the seeing and transparency were both below average, and there was full snow cover on the ground. I couldn’t see the 14.5-magnitude star mentioned in the previous observation. I decided to sketch just the part of the nebula I could see and the four stars visible within it. My sketch looked pretty good to me, but a scanned image didn’t show the faintest parts, so I penciled over the original sketch to make it scan better, I hope without changing anything too much.

fullsizeoutput_1236Pencil Sketch:  Sue French:

North is up and west to the right




Mario Motta: Observer from Massachusetts

Taken with my 32-inch telescope, and SBIG STL 1001E camera.  One hour of H-alpha, one hour of Sulfur S2 filters, and only 20 minutes of O3 filter as there was essentially no Oxygen signal.

Processed in PixInsight.



Roger Ivester: Observer from North Carolina 

On the night of January 28, 2020, the transparency and seeing were very good.  Using my 10-inch, f/4.5 reflector, NGC 1931 was very easy to locate and see at 57×, appearing as a star with a mostly round halo of nebulosity. 

When increasing the magnification to 267×, using a 12mm eyepiece and a 2.8× Barlow, the bright nucleus revealed a tiny trio of faint stars, with a fourth, much fainter star, toward the WSW.  This fourth star was extremely difficult, and could not be held constantly, but intermittently at best.  The nebula was elongated, with a NE-SW orientation.  

The first time I observed NGC 1931 was with poor seeing, on January 8, 1994, and could not see the trio of stars.  My second attempt to see the trio of stars was in January, 2020, but again with poor seeing and transparency, and was unable to see any of the faint stars.   

Pencil sketch, with the colors inverted:   





We welcome our newest participant, Uwe Glahn of Germany:  

Uwe Glahn is an accomplished German observer whose sketches are a joy to behold. They appear in many publications, including my own articles. In the Interstellarum Deep Sky Guide alone, there 821 sketches penciled by Uwe and co-author Ronald Stoyan. You can view Uwe’s remarkable sketches on his website and learn more about his technique, telescopes, and achievements by putting that URL in Google translate   –  Sue French


Uwe Glahn: Observer from Germany

Telescope: 27-inch f/4.2 Newtonian @ 293×.

Seeing: IV, NELM 7.0+

NGC 1931 and Parsamian 1 (a cometary nebula in southern part of NGC 1931)





Gus Johnson: Observer from Maryland

Could not see NGC 1931 on a clear night with a 5-inch at 24×. I also attempted with an H-beta filter at 30× and a UHC filter, however to no avail.  On another night in February 1985, I saw it with an 8-inch reflector @ 40×. Small, fairly bright mostly round nebulosity. Could not see the small trapezium of stars.


Joseph Rothchild:  Observer from Massachusetts

I observed NGC 1931 in Auriga on February 21, 2020.  I observed with my 10-inch reflector under dark skies on Cape Cod.  It was best seen with a 14mm eyepiece at 88×. 

The cluster was found near Phi Aurigae, between M36 and M38. I saw a loose collection of approximately 10 stars (probably background stars) with one brighter star surrounded by a small area of nebulosity. I did not see multiple stars in the cluster itself, but in retrospect may not have used high enough magnification.  Overall, it was much less impressive than its nearby Messier clusters in Auriga, but still interesting to see for the first time.


James Dire:  Observer from Illinois 

NGC 1931 is a mixed emission and reflection nebula with an embedded star cluster found in the constellation Auriga. The nebula is an active star forming region. The complex is located about one degree west and a tad north of the star cluster M36. NGC 1931 also lies 5.75 degrees north and one degree east of the star Elnath. NGC 1931 measures roughly 3 arcminutes in size and lies 10,000 light years away. The nebula is estimated to be magnitude 10.

NGC 1931 contains myriad young, hot O and B stars whose radiation is responsible for the blue hues of the reflection nebula. Four stars in the center of the nebula form a trapezium similar to that in the Orion Nebula. Sometimes NGC 1931 is considered a mini version of the Orion Nebula. A much larger vast region of nebulosity known as IC 417 surrounds NGC 1931. The emissions from IC 417 are the characteristic red colors from H II ions.

My image of NGC 1931 was taken with an 8-inch Ritchey–Chrétien telescope operating at f/6.4 with the use of a focal reducer/field flattener. The camera used was an SBIG ST-2000XCM CCD cooled to -20°C. The exposure was 100 minutes. The bright white area in the center contains the trapezium. The exposure was not long enough to bright out the red emissions of IC 417, which would have filled most of the region captured in this image.



Mike McCabe:  Observer from Massachusetts  

It’s been a while since I’ve participated in the observer’s challenge as I’ve been busy with other projects, so it felt good this past Saturday to prepare my charts and do a little research on the object at hand. 

I conducted this observation from Nike Field which is located in Rehoboth, MA. The conditions were pretty good for these parts – maybe a Bortle 5 sky with transparency starting at 3/5 and dropping off to 2/5, and the seeing fluctuated between 2/5 and 3/5 throughout the evening. 

I made my observation using a 10-inch f/5 Newtonian reflector. NGC 1931 is a tiny emission and reflection nebula that is said to be a miniature version of the Orion Nebula, replete with a trapezium of stars and all. 

The target was easy enough to find and showed up right away as a small fuzzy at medium powers, but all my research suggested cranking it up, so I bumped up the magnification to 250× and set down to make my sketch. If there is indeed a trapezium at the center of the nebulosity it was lost on me – the best I could do was what appeared to be three stars, and the nebulosity was there with direct vision but bloomed up nicely with averted vision. The brightest star of the bunch in the .25º TFOV was about magnitude 11 with all others coming in dimmer than that. The size of the object itself spanned no more than about 4′ on the sky, so really quite small.



Viadislav Mich:  Observer from Massachusetts

Date: Jan 20, 2020

Location: White Mountains National forest, New Hampshire

Conditions: Bortle 2, average seeing

Using: 22-inch f/3.3 DOB with a 21mm eyepiece (~88×, FOV~65′), 10mm (~185×, FOV~33′), NV intensifier (~92×, FOV~26′)

Filter:  5nm Ha filter used with NV intensifier

Notes: Stars in the open cluster seems to be forming line and arch patterns (or is it my brain forming them?).  Only the core of the nebula could be seen in 21mm and 10mm eyepieces. It looks like elliptical galaxy. When switching to NV intensifier with 5nm Ha filter, I was able to see extended nebulosity around the core, forming U-shaped halo.



Glenn Chaple:  Observer from Massachusetts 

Sketch:  NGC 1931, as seen with 4.5-inch f/8 reflector at 150×. Field diameter is 0.4 degrees.


On an evening with a magnitude limit of 5 and so-so seeing conditions, I viewed NGC 1931 by star-hopping from 5th magnitude phi (φ) Aurigae. With my 4.5-inch f/8 reflector and a magnifying power of 150×, I could make out what appeared to be a 10th magnitude nebulous “star.” A switch to a 10-inch f/5 scope and 208× brightened the nebula and split the star 

(HJ 367), magnitudes 11 and 12, separation 8 arc-seconds), but atmospheric turbulence prevented me from seeing any other embedded stars.  Glenn  


Corey Mooney:  Observer from Massachusetts

I live stacked NGC 1931 with my EAA rig on January 29th. I set up at a nearby athletic field in Sudbury MA for better horizons. Once setup, my system could be operated remotely, so I placed my control tablet on the folded-down passenger seat of my car and I was able to comfortably sit, view and control from the back seat while being shielded from most of the elements (still bundled up for the cold). 

When I slewed to NGC 1931 using short, 2-second exposures, I was able to detect a little bit of nebulosity around the central stars. I zoomed into the live view to look at the stars. I decreased the rolling exposure to 1s, 0.5s then to 0.25s to try and split the SW “trapezium” star. But no luck. It was definitely elongated, but no separation. Maybe a bigger image scale would do it.

After examining the central stars I set the exposure to 8s and began live stacking. As it stacked the red/pink emission nebulosity surrounding the central stars became much more visible. After playing with the histogram stretch the structure of the surrounding gas and dust started to show up. There were darker, opaque areas just to the north and SE of the cluster and there was a faintly rim-lit area farther out to the SW. The faint blue reflection nebula around the mag 11.1 star 3.5′ south of the cluster was also visible; it was much fainter than the emission nebula around the cluster. 



Chris Elledge:  Observer from Massachusetts

On January 26th @ 7:28pm EST, I used a 10-inch f/5 refractor to observe NGC 1931 from the ATMoB Clubhouse. Sky conditions were: Bortle Scale 6; NELM 5.0; Transparency: Fair; Seeing: Average.

With Auriga approaching zenith, I was able to detect the approximate location of Phi Aurigae and its associated cluster with naked-eye averted vision. Centering this area in a 35mm 1.9º FoV, the NGC 1931 cluster was visible at the Eastern edge of the view.

At 115× (11mm 0.71º FoV) there is a group of mag. 11 stars forming a square with corners in the NE, SE, SW, & NW directions (TYC 2411-1002-1, TYC 2411-2115-1, TYC 2411-2320-1, & BD+34 1074A). The NW star of the square has visible nebulosity around it. A close pair of mag. 11 stars (TYC 2411-2086-2 & TYC 2411-0996-1) are located to the East of the SE star of the square. Two more mag. 11 stars sit to the West of the square. One West of the SW corner (TYC 2411-2209-1), and one West of the NW corner (TYC 2411-2224-1).

At 270× (4.7mm 0.3º FoV) the NW star (BD +34 1074A) of the square has a small concentration of nebulosity around it. It makes a cone from the East side of the star and spreads out a short distance arcing between the North and West. Three stars of the tight trapezium cluster containing BD +34 1074 A and B are easily split and visible. A 4th star, mag. 14, was sporadically visible when the seeing settled.


Michael Brown:  Observer from Massachusetts 

I observed NGC 1931 in my 8-inch SCT and 9mm eyepiece, on January 29 and February 23, 2020. The object appeared to me as a small, sparse, open cluster with a surrounding area of nebulosity, with the brightest part of the nebula apparently south of the main cluster. In the center of the nebula is a pair of relatively bright stars, which I was able to see with direct vision (as opposed to averted vision) after studying the object for a few minutes. With averted vision, I was able to see a third star northwest of the pair.

While not the “object of the month,” I decided to check out nearby NGC 1893. This is also a cluster and nebula, but much brighter, with an elongated, curved shape.


Richard Nugent:  Observer from Massachusetts

The nebula is visible through the 10-inch as a small, faint, amorphous glow surrounding a small, nearly equilateral triangle with stars of 11th, 12th, and 13th magnitude. On 28 February 2020, skies were very stable with the 5th and 6th stars of M42’s Trapezium visible through the 10-inch scope at 250×. NGC 1931 showed the nebulosity even at 50×; however, the 13th magnitude star of the triangle was only visible at 250× with averted vision.

Earlier in the month, the 20-inch telescope showed the three stars easily, with two 14th magnitude stars straddling the triangle and a slight hint of a nearby 15th magnitude star.

With Steve Clougherty’s 18-inch telescope, the 15th magnitude star was visible with averted vision. Through the club’s 25-inch scope, that star could be viewed with direct vision. The skies in Westford have about a 0.5-magnitude advantage over those in Framingham.

NGC 1931 With Magnitudes - Mar 5 2020 - 10-34 AM







NGC 1999 – Reflection Nebula With Hole: January 2020 – Observer’s Challenge Report

January 23, 2020



Compiled by:

Roger Ivester, North Carolina


Sue French, New York

January 2020

Report #132

NGC 1999 Reflection Nebula in Orion

Sharing Observations and Bringing Amateur Astronomers Together


The purpose of the Observer’s Challenge is to encourage the pursuit of visual observing. It’s open to everyone who’s interested, and if you’re able to contribute notes, and/or drawings, we’ll be happy to include them in our monthly summary. Visual astronomy depends on what’s seen through the eyepiece. Not only does it satisfy an innate curiosity, but it allows the visual observer to discover the beauty and the wonderment of the night sky. Before photography, all observations depended on what astronomers saw in the eyepiece, and how they recorded their observations. This was done through notes and drawings, and that’s the tradition we’re stressing in the Observer’s Challenge. And for folks with an interest in astrophotography, your digital…

View original post 1,117 more words

Building a Hot Rod in November 1964: The Beatles Came to America in February of That Year, Cassius Clay Wins the Heavy-Weight Boxing Championship Over Sonny Liston. And I was Eleven Years Old…

January 15, 2020

Date:  November 1964  

     My five older brothers built something similar or akin to what might be called a Rat Rod today.  The origin was a 1951 Studebaker…using the frame (which had been shortened by three feet), engine, and other parts. 

       In the following photos are my brother Jimmy, who was driving, I’m in the middle with the “cool” cowboy hat, and my brother, Phillip.

     My older brothers, Richard, Jimmy, Ronny, Donnie and Phillip, worked on fabricating “The Bug” as it was called.   I was a bit too young, and mostly just enjoyed watching.  Sometimes I would assist by handing them wrenches or anything else they might need.   

     Improvements were made over the next year with the installation of a mid-50’s Chrysler Hemi engine, which had much more horsepower than the Studebaker.     

     The sad looking tires, especially the front white-walls would eventually be changed out with some better looking wheels.  Additions would also be made to the body, however, still constructed of wood panels.  With a larger budget, many improvements could have been made, but….

     My brother, Donnie, being in high school drove the school bus in the background, which was an early 1950’s model Chevrolet.  

An astronomical telescope purchase in 1963:    

     It was my brother Jimmy, who had already purchased (at the time of the photo) a 60mm f/15 equatorially mounted refractor from Sears, at a cost of $100.  This would be the equivalent of $835 in 2019.  An expensive telescope for sure.

     Two years later, I would begin using this telescope to observe deep-sky objects (galaxies, nebulae and star clusters) and a lifelong interest in astronomy would follow, even to this day.

Roger Ivester   

The Beginning of a Hot Rod

The Beginning of a Hot Rod - 2

  Now going to the future and current:     

     As time progressed, and with an improved budget, greater skills and abilities, my brother Phillip would become a race car and engine builder.  He would also go on to win an incredible 164 drag racing events.    

The following photo was made in September 2019:     

Race Car Wheeley


     Phillip still has two race cars, and continues to race this car, as well as his second “almost” identical car, and will race again in 2020.      







The Three Types of Astronomical Deep-Sky Sketches Identified and Explained

January 5, 2020


     Recently it occurred to me, there is not a definitive identification of the various types of deep-sky sketching techniques.  It’s my opinion, there are basically three types of sketches, but as of current, have never been identified or named.    

     I would like to recommend or propose to the amateur astronomy community, that this identification of deep-sky sketches be considered as a standard for all future discussions and for proper identification, concerning deep-sky drawings.      

     Detailed visual telescope sketching:  Observing an object through a telescope via an eyepiece. Drawing the object on paper or a sketch card “as verbatim” as possible using a pencil, or pencils of various hardness or other.   

     I’m a visual back yard observer with more than forty years of experience.  All of my sketches are made using a pencil and a 5 x 8…

View original post 261 more words

Cline Observatory Double Star List – Compiled By Tom English; Consisting of 25 Doubles and 5 Triples

January 3, 2020


Cline Observatory Double Star List – 25double-5triple

Tom English has put together an excellent list of twenty five doubles and five  multiple stars, which at first glance would seem to be compiled for only those new to this facet of amateur astronomy.  However, for those of us who have enjoyed double star observing for decades, we know there is no such thing as a beginners list.

Double star lists can be comprised of the most difficult pairs due to their close separations and sometimes with unequal magnitudes, or those with wide separations and beautiful contrasting colors.  It was the latter which coined the name: “The jewels of the night sky.”

This list contains some beautiful and interesting doubles, all of which can be observed with a small telescope.  

The famous double star, Epsilon Bootis is probably the most difficult double on the list, which has always required a 4-inch aperture…

View original post 169 more words